
Legally Speaking
Understanding
Supplemental Needs Trust for the Disabled
by Susan S. Brown, Esq.,
Planning your financial
future is always a complicated and intensely personal undertaking. This
planning is particularly complicated when a person is disabled. A disabled
person with resources should be concerned about protecting those resources
while maintaining eligibility for means tested government benefits. The parents
and family of a disabled individual may dedicate themselves to helping their child
achieve maximum emotional, physical and financial independence, but they
undoubtedly worry about the day that they can no longer provide a safety net.
This article will describe the "Supplemental Needs Trust" or
"Special Needs Trust",("SNT") which provides a legal safe
harbor in which a disabled person's inheritance, or her own hers own funds, may
be securely
administered for his or
her benefit with the added advantage of exempting those funds from being
counted as resources for the purpose of qualifying the disabled beneficiary for
"means tested" government benefits such as Medicaid Assistance or Supplemental Security
Income.
Traditional Planning for
Disabled Heirs
Financial and estate
planning for the disabled has traditionally been. accomplished in
several(mostly unsatisfactory) ways. A disabled person with his or her own,
resources had little choice other than to "spend down" his, or her
assets in order to qualify for many government benefits.
Similarly, the parents
or grandparents of a disabled
individual who is sufficiently competent to administer his or her own funds
might simply bequeath to the disabled person an outright share if their
estates.
I
However, an outright
inheritance can cause ineligibility for means tested government benefits, with
the undesirable result that the disabled individual would be required to
"spend down" his or her inheritance in order to remain eligible or
qualify for such benefits.
Consequently, many
estate plans maintain a disabled person eligibility for government benefits by
disinheriting the disabled individual, and leaving the family fortune to his or
her siblings upon whom a moral obligation is imposed to expend a share of their
inheritance for the benefit of their disinherited and disabled sibling. Of
course, this unsecured estate "Plan", exposes the disabled person's
share of the family fortune to various risks, such as the siblings' creditors,
improvidence, bankruptcy, divorce or other circumstances that could reduce the amount
of assets held for a disabled relative.
Finally, the best
alternative is, and traditionally has been, to leave a disabled person's
inheritance in a "discretionary' trust, the terms of which allow the
Trustee to distribute trust funds for the best interests of the disabled
beneficiary. A trust offers the best alternative to protect the assets for the
intended beneficiary, and the discretionary nature of its terms enables the
Trustee to refuse to expend trust funds if government benefits are otherwise
available to meet the beneficiaries needs.
Supplemental Needs
Trusts or Special Needs Trusts
Discretionary trusts
have been in use and approved by New York courts for the disabled since a 1978
case, known as Matter of Escher, permitted a disabled trust beneficiary to
qualify for means tested government benefits, thus overruling the argument of
the Department of Social Service that he was ineligible for such benefits due
to the existence of a discretionary trust holding substantial resources for his
benefit. Congress and the New York legislature finally caught on and endorsed
the Supplemental Needs Trust through legislation passed in 1993. From a policy
perspective, this is sensible legislation, which permits a disabled individual
to enjoy an improved quality of life as the beneficiary of an SNT, without
affecting his or her eligibility for government assistance. Examples of uses to
which SNT finds may be put, on behalf of the disabled beneficiary are: travel,
computers, special therapies or equipment, education, vehicles and supplemental
medical treatments or aides.
Types Of SNTs"
There are three types of
SNT. The "third party SNT", the "self-settled SNT" and the
"pooled SNT'. Family and friends, who do not have a legal obligation to
support a disabled individual, may establish a lifetime or testamentary
"third part," SNT for his or
her benefit, to provide funds for purposes other than those provided through
government programs.
Or, a parent,
grandparent, legal guardian or court may create and fund a "self-settled"
SNT with funds that belong to the disabled beneficiary - typically, the
proceeds of a lawsuit or an outright inheritance. Finally, a "pooled"
SNT permits a disabled individual or his or her family to contribute funds to a
pooled trust created by a not-for-profit agency, such as ARC or UJA-Federation,
in exchange for services for the disabled beneficiary, through the agency.
During the disabled
beneficiary's lifetime, there is essentially no difference between the third
party and self-settled SNT. Trust distributions may be made on behalf of the
disabled beneficiary to "supplement, not supplant impair or diminish,
government benefits or assistance for which the beneficiary may otherwise be
eligible" (New York Estates Powers and Trusts Law) However, the law
requires a self-settled SNT to provide that upon the death of the disabled
beneficiary, the State must be reimbursed for amounts expended by the State, on
his or her behalf.
After this
"pay-back" requirement is satisfied, the remaining funds, if any, are
paid to the disabled beneficiary's estate. A third party SNT does not have this
"pay-back" requirement. Upon the death of a disabled beneficiary of a
third party SNT, the remaining funds may be paid to any individuals or entities
designated by the SNT creator. Upon the death of a pooled SNT beneficiary the
trust remainder is subject to pay back"
requirements if self-settled or, if a third party contributed to the
pooled SNT, the remainder is payable to the not-for-profit agency and, sometimes,
other individuals or, entities designated by the third party contributor.
Requirements of an SNT
While the criteria for a
valid SNT vary in some respects between a self-settled SNT, a third party SNT
and a pooled SNT, the basic requirements are:
1. The beneficiary must
have a "chronic or persistent" disability, including mental illness,
developmental disability or other physical or mental impairment;
2. Self-settled SNTs can
only be created for disabled individuals under age 65, unless they are pooled;
3. Self-settled SNTs are
subject to certain reporting requirements to government agencies such as the
Department of Social Services;
4. The trust document
must state the creator's intent to supplement and not supplant government
benefits to which the beneficiary is entitled;
5. The trust document
must prohibit the beneficiary from having direct access to the trust funds
(e.g.., the Trustee has complete discretion to make distributions of trust
funds on the beneficiary's behalf;
6. In general, an SNT
that is established or created by an individual who is legally responsible for:
the disabled beneficiary(e.g.., the parent of a disabled child underage 18)
must contain pay-back provisions to reimburse the State for government funds expended
on behalf of the disabled beneficiary.
Recommendations
As a trusts and estates
lawyer, I have drafted and reviewed many trusts for
the disabled
individuals, both before and after the enactment of the New York and federal legislation approving the SNT as a
"safe harbor" in which funds may be protected for the benefit of a
disabled beneficiary.
Based upon this
experience, the following are my recommendations to establish a comprehensive
SNT:
1. New York legislation
validating SNTs contains specimen trust language. Adopt this language to insure
the beneficiary's eligibility for government as provided by the SNT
legislation. It's hard to argue about the validity or purpose of a trust that
contains the same provisions as those provided in statute.
2. Incorporate in the
SNT, optional statutory language which permits the Trustee to distribute funds
for a purpose that is also available to the disabled beneficiary through
government benefits, if the Trustee determents that the beneficiary's needs are
better served by using trust funds for that purpose. This is protective of the
disabled beneficiary in case government programs are inadequate.
3. Provide for the
Trustee to purchase a residence for the disabled beneficiary, if the Trustee
believes that is appropriate.
4. Include an
"escape hatch" in a third party SNT, allowing the Trustee to
&-tribute the trust funds to an individual (say, a sib-ling and/or, the
disabled beneficiary) if, in the future, SNT legislation is revoked,; narrowed
or amended in any way which threatens the beneficiary's security, eligibility
for government benefits or endangers the trust fund.
5. Choose your Trustee
(or co-trustees)wisely; this person or the entity (such as a bank)will have a
great deal of influence on the quality of life of the disabled beneficiary, and
will be responsible for investing the funds wisely.
Estate Planning
From an estate planning
perspective, a third party SNT is an essential piece of a comprehensive estate
plan for the parents and grandparents of a disabled heir.
If parents or
grandparents wish to provide for a disabled individual, the establishment of a
third party SNT is overwhelmingly preferred to an outright disposition or gift
that would necessitate the creation of a self settled SNT, because the trust
remainder of a third party SNT is not subject to the self-settled SNT
"payback" requirement to reimburse the State. Clearly, on the death
of a disabled heir, the parents or friends who provided for him or her would
prefer to have the remaining trust funds, if any, distributed to their other
children, grandchildren, another individual or charity of the creator's choice.
In order to fund a third party SNT, a life insurance policy
may be obtained to enhance the inheritance of the disabled individual, who may
have greater need for a larger inheritance than his or her independent
siblings. If estate taxes are a concern, a life insurance trust may be set up
to avoid estate taxation on the insurance proceeds; however, the requirements
to avoid gift taxation on a life insurance trust may affect the beneficiary's
eligibility for government benefits.
If a self-settled SNT is
being set up for someone who is incompetent, particularly if it will hold a
large sum of money, estate planning techniques should be considered to protect
the trust remainder from estate taxation on the death of the disabled
beneficiary. A disabled individual should be afforded the same opportunities to
minimize estate taxes as a competent person.
Estate planning, with
Court approval, is an acceptable purpose to be undertaken by an incompetent
person's guardian, so long as the lifetime needs of the disabled beneficiary
are provided for and the State's pay-back is not jeopardized.
Further, the family of a
disabled person with a self-settled SNT may also set up a third party SNT to
provide for the disabled beneficiary only if the self-settled SNT is exhausted,
thereby preserving the third party trust remainder for their chosen remainder
beneficiaries.
Susan S. Brown, Esq. is
a member of Glassman & Brown, LLP, a White Plains [NY] law firm. Ms. Brown
specializes in tax and estate planning, guardianship and elder law, estate
litigation and estate and trust administration.
Copyright ALIVE Magazine
September 1999